TheStreet.com’s Marek Fuchs criticizes the business media for reporting that French drug company Sanofi-Aventis andBristol-Myers Squibb were going to merge and create the world’s largest drug company based on an unsourced French newsletter report.
Fuchs wrote, “That some newsletter somewhere specializes in thin reporting is neither a great surprise nor a business-world tragedy — but it is the way the business media operate, so uncritical in thought, so in need of copy and so willing to pawn responsibility for a mistake on whoever originally said something (‘I was just quoting them,’ is the dog-ate-the-homework excuse).
“The real problem, as I pointed out, came when Reutersran with the story.
“Reuters mentioned in the second sentence of its piece that the information was unsourced. But to my flawless way of thinking, that should be less a qualifier than a disqualifier. Cagey Reuters even gave itself a little cover with use of the passive voice, saying the premerger deal was ‘thought to have been signed last week.’
“The Business Press Maven added that for all he knew (which was nothing), a merger agreement could have been signed last week but that Reuters was being irresponsible in reporting it, even if at what it believed to be a safe distance. I know how these things play out for investors: An unsourced mention may be first reported as such, but with the news cycle turning so quickly and making news outlets fear being second more than being wrong, the rumor is soon reported as basic fact.”
OLD Media Moves
Business media misfires on drug company takeover
February 1, 2007
TheStreet.com’s Marek Fuchs criticizes the business media for reporting that French drug company Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb were going to merge and create the world’s largest drug company based on an unsourced French newsletter report.
Fuchs wrote, “That some newsletter somewhere specializes in thin reporting is neither a great surprise nor a business-world tragedy — but it is the way the business media operate, so uncritical in thought, so in need of copy and so willing to pawn responsibility for a mistake on whoever originally said something (‘I was just quoting them,’ is the dog-ate-the-homework excuse).
“The real problem, as I pointed out, came when Reuters ran with the story.
“Reuters mentioned in the second sentence of its piece that the information was unsourced. But to my flawless way of thinking, that should be less a qualifier than a disqualifier. Cagey Reuters even gave itself a little cover with use of the passive voice, saying the premerger deal was ‘thought to have been signed last week.’
“The Business Press Maven added that for all he knew (which was nothing), a merger agreement could have been signed last week but that Reuters was being irresponsible in reporting it, even if at what it believed to be a safe distance. I know how these things play out for investors: An unsourced mention may be first reported as such, but with the news cycle turning so quickly and making news outlets fear being second more than being wrong, the rumor is soon reported as basic fact.”
Read more here.
Media News
US ambassador meets with WSJ’s Gershkovich
April 19, 2024
Media News
Witley to cover agriculture for Bloomberg Government
April 19, 2024
Full-Time
Bloomberg seeks a deputy bureau chief in Germany
April 18, 2024
Full-Time
Business Insider seeks a VC, startups and tech senior editor in London
April 18, 2024
Media News
Wichita Biz Journal hires Naveed as a reporter
April 18, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.