Categories: OLD Media Moves

Sexist banter on CNBC

Marisa Guthrie of Broadcasting & Cable noted Monday that CNBC anchor Dylan Ratigan’s sexist banter is turning off viewers.

Guthrie wrote, “On Friday morning’s edition of The Call, CNBC correspondent Melissa Francis, who was reporting on frenzied gasoline trading from NYMEX, asked Ratigan: ‘Is it as crazy on your exchange as it is here?’

Dylan RatiganDylan Ratigan“Ratigan’s comeback: ‘I think if I was blond and beautiful I could draw a big crowd.’

“Francis, visibly irked, responded: ‘That’s not what it is all about.’

“Ratigan was obviously chastened, and (mercifully) put his locker room repartee on ice for the remainder of the broadcast.

“CNBC had no comment.

“Sadly, such comments are hardly atypical from Ratigan and his band of merry he-men.”

Read more here.

AddThis Website Tools
Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

View Comments

  • Give me a break. Dylan ad-libs all day long. So he makes one comment that he shouldn't have. And this Marisa makes it seem like he's all evil and sexist.

    Dylan is a good guy; Marisa needs to lighten up a bit. I mean, if she looked like Erin Burnett than maybe someone would say something about the way she looks!

  • The comment was uncalled for. You can ad-lib without calling attention to someone else's looks. It is deeming to suggest that someone is successful in a professional enviroment just because of physical attributes. I am glad he took the hint and didn't continue to add to the original comment.

  • Carol: the word ain't "deeming". i think you meant to say "demeaning". Thanks for throwing a dart at my comment -- though it would help if you used the English language properly!!!

  • I did mean to say "demeaning." Thank you for catching my error, al. I regret that my failure to proof read weakened my point.

  • Cool down guys. All of us are just humans - so errors are natural. So is with Ratigan and Carol.:smile:

Recent Posts

Reuters tech reporter Satter sues Indian government

Reuters tech reporter Raphael Satter has sued the Indian government after his Indian overseas citizenship was cancelled,…

9 hours ago

NY CPAs Excellence in Financial Journalism Awards accepting entries

The New York State Society of CPAs is accepting entries for its annual Excellence in…

9 hours ago

When a company tries to harass journalists

Vikas Kumar, a senior editor at The Capitol Forum, writes about how a company, Zynex,…

9 hours ago

Variety promotes Shafer to deputy editor of international

Variety has promoted Ellise Shafer to deputy editor of international. William Earl of Variety writes, "Shafer, who has…

13 hours ago

Houston Biz Journal hires Miranda to cover growth

The Houston Business Journal has hired Janet Miranda to cover growth. She is covering a wide range…

14 hours ago

Politico taps Nickel to cover cybersecurity

Politico journalist Dana Nickel is now covering cybersecurity and anchoring the "Morning Cyber" newsletter. She has been…

14 hours ago