The Washington Post’s Peter Carlson has a nice review of Fortune magazine’s 75th anniversary in this morning’s paper. You can read about it here.
Peter looks at the good and the bad from the past 75 years. My favorite is the fact that the magazine didn’t think that FDR would be re-elected in 1940. Peter also liked the memoirs of Carol Loomis in the issue.
Crain Communications is seeking a meticulous and analytical data editor to oversee the strategy and…
Financial Times chief economics commentator Martin Wolf writes about a fake "Martin Wolf" that is doling…
We are looking for a Reporter to join ION Analytics’ Paris Bureau covering French M&A…
The New York Times is seeking an editor to help run our coverage of the…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
MarketWatch.com executive editor Nathan Vardi sent out the following on Friday: All, I am delighted to announce…
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="29px" width="180px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="75px" width="75px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)