Rachel Armstrong of Reuters reports, “A High Court judge ruled on Thursday after a private hearing that there were not sufficient grounds of public interest for the story to be published.
“‘I found that the information in question was confidential and that the public interest in the maintenance of confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure,’ judge Andrew Popplewell said in a statement issued on Friday.
“He added that he would provide fuller reasons for the judgment in the near future.
“A Reuters spokeswoman said: ‘Our objective is to publish news and information which is in the public interest, which we believe outweighs the confidentiality concerns put forward in this matter.
“‘We are therefore deeply disappointed by this ruling and are reviewing the court’s decision.'”
Read more here.
Crain Communications is seeking a meticulous and analytical data editor to oversee the strategy and…
Financial Times chief economics commentator Martin Wolf writes about a fake "Martin Wolf" that is doling…
We are looking for a Reporter to join ION Analytics’ Paris Bureau covering French M&A…
The New York Times is seeking an editor to help run our coverage of the…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
MarketWatch.com executive editor Nathan Vardi sent out the following on Friday: All, I am delighted to announce…