Rachel Armstrong of Reuters reports, “A High Court judge ruled on Thursday after a private hearing that there were not sufficient grounds of public interest for the story to be published.
“‘I found that the information in question was confidential and that the public interest in the maintenance of confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure,’ judge Andrew Popplewell said in a statement issued on Friday.
“He added that he would provide fuller reasons for the judgment in the near future.
“A Reuters spokeswoman said: ‘Our objective is to publish news and information which is in the public interest, which we believe outweighs the confidentiality concerns put forward in this matter.
“‘We are therefore deeply disappointed by this ruling and are reviewing the court’s decision.'”
Read more here.
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…
Larry Avila has been named interim editor for Automotive Dive, an Industry Dive publication. He…