Is it too laudatory? Are we seeing the first signs of the media going back to its fawning ways of covering business from the 1990s when we look at how Apple Computer has been covered lately?
That’s the conclusion of Jack Shafer, whose Slate column on the subject can be read here.
I’m going to have to agree with him. I’m currently teaching “Economics Reporting” this semester, and the final project for the class is a stock portfolio that each student picks at the beginning of the semester and then tracks throughout the three months, explaining the highs and lows based on economic data and other factors.
Exactly half of the class picked Apple as one of the stocks in their portfolios. They’re all iPod freaks and fawn over Apple products. Many of them picked Apple as a stock because of their perceived demand for iPods for the Christmas shopping season and the debut of the new video iPod. None have written in their stock papers about any potential problems with these products — or the fact that Apple’s success in new products has not always been 100 percent on target.
It’s a lesson that they’ll have to learn the hard way. Their Apple stock hasn’t made them any money. That sour performance — and me beating them over the head about ethics and objectivity when it comes to owning stocks that you write about — should help open their eyes.
The Wall Street Journal is seeking a senior video journalist to join its Features video…
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
View Comments