Here is an excerpt:
Ackman has lashed out on social media and threatened to “unleash hell” on Business Insider for what he describes as “false reporting.” But does the famously litigious businessman have a case?
I do not believe he has a valid claim against Business Insider on behalf of his wife. It would obviously be his wife who is the plaintiff, not him, but he would pay for it. A key component of a libel claim is that the plaintiff — in this case, Neri Oxman — would have to prove falsity. That would be the threshold question. She would have to allege that she did not plagiarize. She has already admitted to plagiarizing, and there are plenty of comparisons out there of what she wrote and what was originally on Wikipedia. It’s clear that there’s copying. I can’t see how they can get through the threshold question of falsity.
Read more here.
John Hayes, a stalwart of the Financial Times’ sub-editing desk, has died at the age…
Fortune is hiring a Global News Director to oversee breaking news coverage across Europe, the…
David Szymanski, a business journalist in the Tampa Bay area dating back to the 1980s,…
Charlotte Tobitt of Press Gazette interviewed Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker on how it can…
The New York Times, Reuters, Bloomberg and Bloomberg Businessweek received Deadline Club awards for business…
The Wall Street Journal seeks an experienced journalist to become Business, Finance & Economics Editor…