Orange County Register columnist Jon Lansner wonders why Wal-Mart has received so much criticism for its decision to offer $4 generic drugs.
He wrote, “I can’t recall any other seemingly consumer-friendly move by a U.S. retailer getting such harsh treatment. Usually, price cuts of any sort are cheered – outside of comments from greedy investors who often bemoan discounts that crush stock prices.
“Let’s just say that Wal-Mart’s no media darling. And they’ve probably deserved some of the tough coverage.
“Previous transgressions aside, what’s not to love with any company who’s messing with a less than loved industry, the pharmaceutical crowd?
“But some reporters seemingly worked real hard to find supposed critics of the four-buck drug deals. Funny how most of these critics make money by charging more than four bucks for drugs.
“Like Richard Stevens of the West Virginia Pharmacists Association. He told the Charleston Daily Mail: ‘I’m not implying Wal-Mart dispenses outdated medicine. … But the older medications won’t do the job that some of the newer ones can.’
“Richard, your own members dispense the same pills – albeit at a higher price. I assume they’re doubly wrong?
“Or an oft repeated public statement from the National Community Pharmacists Association trade group’s Bruce Roberts. ‘If you look at the list of medications they are offering for $4, it represents about 1 percent of the total number of drugs available,’ he said.”
Read more here.
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…