Lucy Kellaway of the Financial Times writes Sunday about the problems of Fortune magazine trying to rank the best places to work.
“We all know what distinguishes a good employer from a bad one. A good one provides four basic things. First, it makes sure that everyone has a proper job to do. Second, it pays them fairly. Third, it makes employees feel that their efforts are recognised. And fourth, it gives them nice people to work with. That’s all: there is nothing else.
“Fortunately, there is an easy way to measure whether a company is succeeding at these things. It doesn’t involve answering tiresome questions on long feedback forms. It does not require any examination of benefits or of corporate social responsibility policies. There is nothing subjective about the test at all.
“It simply measures how long people stay with a company. This is the only consideration that matters. Anyone who is not happy with their job will eventually go somewhere else. If most people stay put for a long time, the company automatically proves itself to be a good place to work.”
Read more here.
New York Times business editor Ellen Pollock sent out the following: I’m excited to announce: Mohammed Hadi…
Hannah Dreier, an investigative reporter at The New York Times, won a Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting…
The Washington Business Journal has hired Ben Peters to cover commercial real estate. He has been the…
Bloomberg Radio has a rare opportunity for a motivated, hardworking Producer to contribute to it's…
Wall Street Journal reporter Dave Sebastian was among the layoffs last week when it reorganized its Asia…
Wirecutter editorial director Lauren Sullivan sent out the following: I’m elated to announce that Maxine Builder, a…
