We knew it was an important story. Whitman and founder Jeffrey Katzenberg are trying to build one of the world’s most ambitious media companies, in part by working with news companies.
Tom and Jessica published the story and included Quibi’s official statement, which was that our report was “materially inaccurate.” Our sources said otherwise and I was extremely confident in the piece. But I still left the office upset and shaken that night—upset that she had said what she had, upset that our reporters were being discredited, upset that the news cycle continued to return to this issue. No editor likes to publish a story about attacks on the press, and then to be attacked for it. I was on edge about what Whitman would say to others about the piece. But she didn’t say anything—for days.
Then Friday, at the Sundance Film Festival, Whitman gave an interview to Variety, apologized for her comments and said they were “mostly accurately portrayed.” I’m glad she apologized. Just wondering what took so long and why the company lied to us and the public.
Bloomberg News and AppliedXl have launched an artificial intelligence-powered real-time news feed covering biotech for…
Crain's Chicago Business is a leading source of news, analysis, and information on the business,…
Emma Sandler has been hired as associate editor at Agenda, a publication under the FT…
Cablefax Daily interviewed Fox Business Network anchor Liz Claman on her induction into the Cable Hall…
BBC News has hired Charlotte Edwards as a reporter covering money, work and technology. She previously was…
Reuters has promoted Hatem Maher to deputy breaking news editor for the Middle East. Maher has been…