NYT’s public editor slams Nocera column on Buffett
May 9, 2014
Posted by Chris Roush
Margaret Sullivan, the public editor at the New York Times, is critical of columnist Joe Nocera for his recent writing about billionaire investor Warren Buffett.
Sullivan writes, “It’s understood that nobody needs to feel sorry for Mr. Buffett, one of the world’s wealthiest people, nor does he suggest anything of the kind. ‘I’ve got more ability to respond than most,’ he told me, in an understatement. Given his stature, his actions are fair game for legitimate criticism. But if you’re going to impugn someone’s integrity, you’d better have your facts straight.
“In this instance, because the second column is so intrinsically flawed, a standard correction didn’t get the job done. Mr. Nocera should have devoted at least part of another column to telling his readers what happened and why. In his email to me, Mr. Nocera referred to the second column’s fundamental mistake as ‘bad/dumb/embarrassing.’
“Such a forthright admission should not be confined to an email answer to the public editor’s question, but should be published in the same Times pages where the two columns ran. Ideally, the online version of the second column would provide a clear link to the mea culpa. That would go a long way toward making this right.”
OLD Media Moves
NYT’s public editor slams Nocera column on Buffett
May 9, 2014
Posted by Chris Roush
Margaret Sullivan, the public editor at the New York Times, is critical of columnist Joe Nocera for his recent writing about billionaire investor Warren Buffett.
Sullivan writes, “It’s understood that nobody needs to feel sorry for Mr. Buffett, one of the world’s wealthiest people, nor does he suggest anything of the kind. ‘I’ve got more ability to respond than most,’ he told me, in an understatement. Given his stature, his actions are fair game for legitimate criticism. But if you’re going to impugn someone’s integrity, you’d better have your facts straight.
“In this instance, because the second column is so intrinsically flawed, a standard correction didn’t get the job done. Mr. Nocera should have devoted at least part of another column to telling his readers what happened and why. In his email to me, Mr. Nocera referred to the second column’s fundamental mistake as ‘bad/dumb/embarrassing.’
“Such a forthright admission should not be confined to an email answer to the public editor’s question, but should be published in the same Times pages where the two columns ran. Ideally, the online version of the second column would provide a clear link to the mea culpa. That would go a long way toward making this right.”
Read more here.
Media News
Kynge departing FT after 28 years
December 28, 2024
Media News
Debtwire hires Nair as distressed debt reporter
December 28, 2024
Media News
Oatis, Reuters Americas desk editor, is retiring
December 28, 2024
Full-Time
Front Office Sports seeks a business of women sports reporter
December 28, 2024
Full-Time
Front Office Sports seeks a finance reporter
December 28, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.