Jesse Eisinger of Conde Nast Portfolio reports that McGraw-Hill Inc., the parent company of BusinessWeek magazine, rating agency Standard & Poor’s and other properties, has decided not to publish a book by well-known financial blogger Barry Ritholtz that blames part of the economic turmoil on S&P’s faulty ratings.
Eisinger writes, “Yet Ritholtz says it still was a no-go. Suddenly, he says, McGraw Hill editors were indicating that his assertions couldn’t be verified. ‘All the conversations I had with them, they made apparent this was all about S&P’s role as sister company,’ Ritholtz says. ‘It had nothing to do with sources and footnoting.
‘For anyone to suggest to verify this is difficult obviously has never used Google,’ Ritholtz adds.
“The writer says he has indications of interest from other publishers.
“‘We made all these changes and turned it into something that was much more damning: The hyperbole goes away,’ Ritholtz says. ‘I think they would have been better off where I’m just looking like a maniac.
‘Instead,’ he adds, ‘it’s all facts and figures and data and it’s much worse, much more dangerous to them.'”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
View Comments
Ritholtz gave his editors an ultimatum, and they said "no." Most publishers would take the same stance.