Doug Kass, a money manager who writes for TheStreet.com, defends CNBC “Mad Money” host Jim Cramer and his investment picks on Monday while noting that he does so without any prodding from TheStreet.com, where Cramer is a major investor and board member.
Kass writes, “Finally, many of Jim’s investment recommendations are indeed nuanced and qualified. Treating every investment recommendation as the same and compiling an investment performance is, to some degree, comparing apples to oranges.
“In my final analysis, individual investors are better served listening to Jim Cramer, both with regard to his recommendations and his methodology, than any other business commentator extant. His body of investment knowledge is remarkably broad and lacks the superficiality of most of his brethren.
“Jim is an investment populist who, unlike many in my hedge fund cabal, has forsaken that financial rainbow for a greater cause — namely, helping out the individual investor.
“Jim is an easy target, but from my perch, he should not be vilified; he should be admired.”
Read more here.
Wall Street Journal reporter Hannah Miao is moving to Singapore to cover the China economy.…
Financial Times reporter Simon Foy is now covering European banks. He has been covering accounting for the…
Debtwire, the leading provider of global fixed income news, analysis and data for more than…
Amber Kanwar, an anchor for BNN Bloomberg in Canada, is departing at the end of…
Moody's Ratings has promoted Yvette Kantrow to senior vice president and editor in chief. She has been…
Politico reporter Clare Fieseler is leaving the news organization to take on some ocean reporting projects. She…
View Comments
I don't watch cable and hear little of Cramer's advice. But I wonder if readers/listeners are poorly served by scorecards that declare "good" or "bad" stock picks on a limited timeframe.
My grandmother, who was widowed in her 20s with a baby and toddler to raise, refused Owens Illinois (eventually Corning) stock in favor of raises as small as $75 during her long carer there. She'd have been a millionaire had she taken the Depression-era stock and held it.
With the rare exception of delisted and otherwise dud stocks, it is difficult to judge a pick based on this year or a five year horizon. It was ever thus, and as journalists we owe this disclaimer in our coverage.