Hamilton Nolan writes for PR Week that the criticism of the Philadelphia Inquirer for selling a sponsorship for a column in its business section to a local bank has its editors on the defensive.
“Asked if he received any assurances about the editorial independence of the new column, he replies: ‘When our owners bought the paper a year ago, they assured us about editorial independence. I don’t have to go back to them every time.’
“And asked if the readers themselves deserve some extra assurance that a business column sponsored and branded by a local advertiser would, in fact, be independent, Lavin responds: ‘We give them those assurances every day through what we cover. You’re judged by the kind of coverage you provide. Nobody in this company would do anything to damage that credibility.’
“While there seems to be no reason not to take Lavin at his word, the view that simply saying, ‘We are honest,’ is enough to negate such an apparent conflict of interest is myopic in the extreme. This is the reason that so many rules exist to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest: Because once the appearance exists, a reader can never be totally certain the actual conflict is not affecting coverage.”
Read more here. If even the PR people paying attention think there’s an appearance of a conflict — even if there may not be — then you know you’re in trouble.
The Star Tribune is seeking an accomplished, motivated and versatile journalist and leader to shape…
The Deputy AME-Business is responsible for the development and planning of coverage on all Newsday…
CNBC.com managing editor Jeff McCracken announced Friday the following promotions: In San Francisco, Ari Levy has…
This Newsday reporter will cover Long Island’s commercial real estate market and the region’s evolving…
The New York Times is looking for a versatile editor to edit enterprise and feature…
International editor Matt Lamers is leaving Marijuana Business Daily. He has been there for seven years. Lamers…