Noted class-action shareholder lawsuit lawyer William Lerach alleges in a letter in the Dec. 11 issue of Fortune magazine that the biz glossy had a conflict of interest that it didn’t disclose in its Nov. 13 cover story about the breakup of Lerach’s former firm.
Lerach wrote, “Your article failed to mention that I represent some 70 institutional investors from all over the world who are prosecuting a case against Fortune’s parent company, AOL Time Warner, where the clients are demanding billions in cash to hold AOL Time Warner accountable for issuing an admittedly false and misleading registration statement in connection with the merger.
“It is clear that the article was meant to impact the case by undermining our resolve to recover billions of dollars of losses your company caused our clients.”
The Fortune letters aren’t available online. What I find interesting is that there is an article in the same issue on p. 30 about former Enron CFO Andy fastow that mentioned Lerach, and in that article, there is the following disclosure: “Lerach’s firm has lawsuits pending against Time Warner, Fortune’s parent company.”
Which makes you wonder why the disclosure was included in that one-page article, but not in the cover story from last month. What changed in the past month that merited the disclosure now, but not then?
The Yale Program on Stakeholder Innovation and Management announced the appointment of Alan Murray, departing chief…
The Advocate is looking for a savvy reporter to cover the Baton Rouge business scene…
MLex, a LexisNexis company, is an independent news organization for breaking news and forward-looking analysis…
The Austin Business Journal seeks a staff writer to cover economic development in one of…
A Russian court on Saturday placed Sergei Mingazov, a journalist for the Russian edition of…
Justin Nielsen of Investor's Business Daily writes about the newspaper's 40th anniversary. Nielsen writes, "When the…