Kelly writes, “The dispute, which is playing out in Delaware Chancery Court, stems from a missed $46,000 interest payment that came due only weeks after the deal closed in September 2014. Most recently, Judge J. Travis Laster sided with the family and dismissed the buyers’ motion to toss the case.
“‘In terms of the motion to strike — I’ll be kind — that was just not a well-founded motion,’ the judge said in his latest ruling.
“The buyer, Integrated Whale Media, said the suit ‘is without merit and that the Forbes family, not IWM, is in breach of their obligations.’ IWM said it’s meeting its obligations ‘and will continue to do so.’
“The Forbes family walked away with less than $100 million after selling the company, founded by B.C. Forbes in 1917. Clearly, their Scottish blood is boiling over what they regard as delaying tactics by IWM, a joint venture formed by Asia-based investors Tak Cheung Yam and Sammy Wong to buy the company two years ago.”
Read more here.
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…