Kelly writes, “The dispute, which is playing out in Delaware Chancery Court, stems from a missed $46,000 interest payment that came due only weeks after the deal closed in September 2014. Most recently, Judge J. Travis Laster sided with the family and dismissed the buyers’ motion to toss the case.
“‘In terms of the motion to strike — I’ll be kind — that was just not a well-founded motion,’ the judge said in his latest ruling.
“The buyer, Integrated Whale Media, said the suit ‘is without merit and that the Forbes family, not IWM, is in breach of their obligations.’ IWM said it’s meeting its obligations ‘and will continue to do so.’
“The Forbes family walked away with less than $100 million after selling the company, founded by B.C. Forbes in 1917. Clearly, their Scottish blood is boiling over what they regard as delaying tactics by IWM, a joint venture formed by Asia-based investors Tak Cheung Yam and Sammy Wong to buy the company two years ago.”
Read more here.
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
Members of the CoinDesk editorial team have sent a letter to the CEO of its…