Kelly writes, “The dispute, which is playing out in Delaware Chancery Court, stems from a missed $46,000 interest payment that came due only weeks after the deal closed in September 2014. Most recently, Judge J. Travis Laster sided with the family and dismissed the buyers’ motion to toss the case.
“‘In terms of the motion to strike — I’ll be kind — that was just not a well-founded motion,’ the judge said in his latest ruling.
“The buyer, Integrated Whale Media, said the suit ‘is without merit and that the Forbes family, not IWM, is in breach of their obligations.’ IWM said it’s meeting its obligations ‘and will continue to do so.’
“The Forbes family walked away with less than $100 million after selling the company, founded by B.C. Forbes in 1917. Clearly, their Scottish blood is boiling over what they regard as delaying tactics by IWM, a joint venture formed by Asia-based investors Tak Cheung Yam and Sammy Wong to buy the company two years ago.”
Read more here.
Financial Times chief economics commentator Martin Wolf writes about a fake "Martin Wolf" that is doling…
We are looking for a Reporter to join ION Analytics’ Paris Bureau covering French M&A…
The New York Times is seeking an editor to help run our coverage of the…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
MarketWatch.com executive editor Nathan Vardi sent out the following on Friday: All, I am delighted to announce…
The Financial Times and Schroders Business Book of the Year Award is now open for…