David Jones of Crain’s New York Business writes Tuesday that journalism professors and experts are bothered by the revelation that top Wall Street Journal editors knew about the $5 billion offer from News Corp. to acquire Dow Jones & Co., the Journal’s parent, but held the story for a week until another media outlet broke the news.
Jones wrote, “Mitchell Stephens, a journalism professor at New York University, says that editors often withhold information from the public. ‘Obviously one understands this is a tricky business for these people,’ he said. ‘However, any time editors decide [they will not publish] information that they have that is clearly newsworthy. . . makes me nervous. It upsets my stomach.’
“‘It’s the unusual situation where your responsibilities as an editor or manager come into conflict with covering the news,’ said Mr. Edmonds. ‘I would be fairly sympathetic to what they did.’
“He said the fact that Mr. Murdoch contacted Mr. Steiger in an email labeled ‘personal and confidential’ would preclude him from going public with the information.
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…