Categories: OLD Media Moves

Cuss words and business journalism

Allen Wastler, the managing editor of CNBC.com, writes about the issue facing business journalists covering the Congressional hearings about Goldman Sachs earlier this week — do you use the cuss words spoken or not?

Wastler writes, “Journalistically the actual use of the word is valid: It is central to how a Goldman employee really felt about a certain deal…the profane nature of the remark drives the point home. And it’s a U.S. senator making the point.

“But you don’t want to throw profanity in people’s face. It’s impolite and in most cases  unnecessary.

“Nevertheless, opinions will differ, and you saw the disagreements across the media spectrum.

“Some avoided it all together, like one of our partners. They just referred to it as a ‘vulgarity.’ Others just straight out used the term—even some wire services, which isn’t usual and can be a problem for those of us who pick up automatic feeds.”

Read more here.

Recent Posts

Kudlow to remain at Fox Business

Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…

17 hours ago

Wired senior writer Meaker is departing

Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…

1 day ago

CNBC’s head of events departing after 28 years

Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…

1 day ago

WSJ taps Beaudette to oversee business, finance and economy

Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…

2 days ago

NY Times taps Searcey to cover wealth and power

New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…

2 days ago

The evolution of the WSJ beyond finance

Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…

2 days ago