A lawsuit brought by Apple Computer against bloggers who posted confidential information about some of its upcoming products could have negative consequences for business journalism and how reporters deal with confidential sources inside companies, according to coverage on InternetNews.com.
“According to Apple’s court filings, the stories that ran on AppleInsider and PowerPage included verbatim extracts from Apple’s in-house development documentation, as well as confidential pricing projections and marketing analysis.”
If Apple wins the case, the Web sites and other publications that published the documents could be forced to disclose who gave them the information, according to the article.
Dan Gillmor, who works with the Center for Citizen Media, a joint project with Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society and the University of California at Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism, said that the mainstream media haven’t paid nearly enough attention to this case.
In the article, Gillmor said, “The circuit judge essentially ducked the question of whether these folks were doing journalism. But if his ruling is upheld it will be a huge barrier to business journalism in general.”
Read more here.
The Tampa Bay Times announced the launch of its environment hub, which will be comprised…
Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich is not cooperating on either the paper's documentary or…
Jamie Heller, editor in chief of Business Insider, sent out the following: I'm excited to share…
Bloomberg Television launched Monday a new its new broadcast studio in Seoul, South Korea. The…
Brian Stelter writes in his "Reliable Sources" newsletter that business news channel CNBC saw a…
Peggy Collins, Bloomberg News Washington bureau chief, sent the below to the newsroom on Monday…