When I’m in my classroom, I emphasize a lot about avoiding comparing apples to oranges. In the “Business Reporting” class, an example would be to compare the actual stock price of two companies when we all should know that’s a comparison that can’t be made because the two companies don’t have the same number of shares outstanding.
So imagine my chagrin this morning while watching the “Today” show on NBC and seeing a report they did on gasoline prices and how some are predicting that prices are going to get higher this summer, maybe even as high as they were right after Hurricane Katrina.
The reporter, whose name I did not catch, mentioned the fact that higher gasoline prices were coming at a time when the oil companies were reporting higher profits. Then, he mentioned the fact that this had resulted in Exxon replacing Wal-Mart at the top of the Fortune 500 list.
Ugh. Hey dude, the Fortune 500 list is based on revenue, not profits. Now maybe Exxon is at the top of the list because of the increased revenue, but them being at the top of the list has nothing to do with their profits.
Anybody else got a good example of a screw-up related to business terminology in the national media?
OLD Media Moves
Comparing apples to oranges
April 4, 2006
When I’m in my classroom, I emphasize a lot about avoiding comparing apples to oranges. In the “Business Reporting” class, an example would be to compare the actual stock price of two companies when we all should know that’s a comparison that can’t be made because the two companies don’t have the same number of shares outstanding.
So imagine my chagrin this morning while watching the “Today” show on NBC and seeing a report they did on gasoline prices and how some are predicting that prices are going to get higher this summer, maybe even as high as they were right after Hurricane Katrina.
The reporter, whose name I did not catch, mentioned the fact that higher gasoline prices were coming at a time when the oil companies were reporting higher profits. Then, he mentioned the fact that this had resulted in Exxon replacing Wal-Mart at the top of the Fortune 500 list.
Ugh. Hey dude, the Fortune 500 list is based on revenue, not profits. Now maybe Exxon is at the top of the list because of the increased revenue, but them being at the top of the list has nothing to do with their profits.
Anybody else got a good example of a screw-up related to business terminology in the national media?
Media News
The Information hires FT’s Germano
November 19, 2024
Media News
Halperin named co-editor in chief at Hollywood Reporter
November 19, 2024
Media News
Tankersley becomes Berlin bureau chief at NY Times
November 19, 2024
Media News
Politico’s Guggenheim wins Dirksen award
November 19, 2024
Media News
The Economist hires Wu to cover China
November 19, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.