Lynn O’Shaughnessy of the Copley News Service has a story on the wire about how chasing Jim Cramer’s picks from his “Mad Money” show might not be the best thing for investors.
“The price pop was often quite significant. The small- est stocks among those recommended — those in the bottom quartile by size — typically jumped 5.19 percent overnight. The price rise for the entire sampling, which included large-corporation stocks that are harder to move, increased 1.96 percent overnight.”
However, after that, the price falls. O’Shaughnessy writes, “Within 12 trading days, according to the researchers, the paper profits for the smallest stocks disappear. Gains for the overall stock sampling also quickly evaporate.
“The study also concluded that ‘Mad Money’ attracts many vultures, who tune into the show to feast on fresh meat. Short- sellers bet against the Cramer addicts, who are backing up their 18-wheelers, because they suspect that these stocks will deflate quickly. And when they do, the short-sellers, who are most likely hedge fund managers, want to cash in.”
Read the rest here.
The Wall Street Journal is seeking a senior video journalist to join its Features video…
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…