TheStreet.com’s Marek Fuchs criticizes the business media for reporting that French drug company Sanofi-Aventis andBristol-Myers Squibb were going to merge and create the world’s largest drug company based on an unsourced French newsletter report.
Fuchs wrote, “That some newsletter somewhere specializes in thin reporting is neither a great surprise nor a business-world tragedy — but it is the way the business media operate, so uncritical in thought, so in need of copy and so willing to pawn responsibility for a mistake on whoever originally said something (‘I was just quoting them,’ is the dog-ate-the-homework excuse).
“The real problem, as I pointed out, came when Reutersran with the story.
“Reuters mentioned in the second sentence of its piece that the information was unsourced. But to my flawless way of thinking, that should be less a qualifier than a disqualifier. Cagey Reuters even gave itself a little cover with use of the passive voice, saying the premerger deal was ‘thought to have been signed last week.’
“The Business Press Maven added that for all he knew (which was nothing), a merger agreement could have been signed last week but that Reuters was being irresponsible in reporting it, even if at what it believed to be a safe distance. I know how these things play out for investors: An unsourced mention may be first reported as such, but with the news cycle turning so quickly and making news outlets fear being second more than being wrong, the rumor is soon reported as basic fact.”
OLD Media Moves
Business media misfires on drug company takeover
February 1, 2007
TheStreet.com’s Marek Fuchs criticizes the business media for reporting that French drug company Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb were going to merge and create the world’s largest drug company based on an unsourced French newsletter report.
Fuchs wrote, “That some newsletter somewhere specializes in thin reporting is neither a great surprise nor a business-world tragedy — but it is the way the business media operate, so uncritical in thought, so in need of copy and so willing to pawn responsibility for a mistake on whoever originally said something (‘I was just quoting them,’ is the dog-ate-the-homework excuse).
“The real problem, as I pointed out, came when Reuters ran with the story.
“Reuters mentioned in the second sentence of its piece that the information was unsourced. But to my flawless way of thinking, that should be less a qualifier than a disqualifier. Cagey Reuters even gave itself a little cover with use of the passive voice, saying the premerger deal was ‘thought to have been signed last week.’
“The Business Press Maven added that for all he knew (which was nothing), a merger agreement could have been signed last week but that Reuters was being irresponsible in reporting it, even if at what it believed to be a safe distance. I know how these things play out for investors: An unsourced mention may be first reported as such, but with the news cycle turning so quickly and making news outlets fear being second more than being wrong, the rumor is soon reported as basic fact.”
Read more here.
Media News
Moody’s promotes Kantrow to editor in chief
November 5, 2024
Media News
Politico reporter Fieseler departs
November 5, 2024
Media News
WSJ’s Eisen to write book about the mortgage market
November 5, 2024
Media News
Reuters hires Krishnakutty as a news producer
November 5, 2024
Full-Time
Indianapolis Biz Journal seeks a news editor
November 4, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.