He writes, “We weren’t considering this step primarily for editorial reasons. Rather, we recognized in 2014 that while Inc.com traffic was growing, there were a large number of competitors in online business journalism, and our ranking in size – in the middle to lower end of the list – was holding our business back. Moreover, we had a sense that there was ample room to expand not only the volume of what we were publishing, but also the range. The Inc. brand was a credible vehicle for many other types of stories (such as personal finance and product reviews) and formats (such as video) than were feasible in a monthly print magazine. We believed that Inc.com readers would benefit by hearing from a much wider group of columnists: company founders, academics, experts in particular business areas (such as law, human resources, and accounting), marketing experts, cutting-edge technology CEOs, and many more.
“But there were abuses: Beginning in 2016, we learned that an unscrupulous group of marketers were offering to pay our contributors to link to their clients. We found ways to contain and crack down on that practice, and also assigned one of our reporters to investigate the practice. We also reported our findings to the Federal Trade Commission, although it must be said the agency did nothing to follow up.”
Read more here.
Lauren Clason, a health care reporter for Congressional Quarterly and Roll Call, left this week…
The Dallas Morning News seeks an ambitious and versatile editor to drive our business coverage to…
The Bloomberg News Data Visualization team is seeking a Data Visualization Reporter who uses illustrations…
The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has lambasted Russia over its continued detention of…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Thursday: Today we announced…
Clare Malone of The New York writes about Hunterbrook, which is using reporting from journalists to…