He writes, “We weren’t considering this step primarily for editorial reasons. Rather, we recognized in 2014 that while Inc.com traffic was growing, there were a large number of competitors in online business journalism, and our ranking in size – in the middle to lower end of the list – was holding our business back. Moreover, we had a sense that there was ample room to expand not only the volume of what we were publishing, but also the range. The Inc. brand was a credible vehicle for many other types of stories (such as personal finance and product reviews) and formats (such as video) than were feasible in a monthly print magazine. We believed that Inc.com readers would benefit by hearing from a much wider group of columnists: company founders, academics, experts in particular business areas (such as law, human resources, and accounting), marketing experts, cutting-edge technology CEOs, and many more.
“But there were abuses: Beginning in 2016, we learned that an unscrupulous group of marketers were offering to pay our contributors to link to their clients. We found ways to contain and crack down on that practice, and also assigned one of our reporters to investigate the practice. We also reported our findings to the Federal Trade Commission, although it must be said the agency did nothing to follow up.”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…