“We also caught flack for our own headline, which put ‘illegal’ in quotation marks, attributing it to the Democratic commissioners. “@theverge.com, y’all need a more accurate headline,” a reader told us on Bluesky. ‘They’re not SAYING they were illegally fired, they WERE illegally fired. The precedent set in Humphrey’s Executor almost a century ago makes that crystal clear – but you don’t address that until the next to last paragraph. DO BETTER!’
“This is a pretty typical dynamic when the news hedges, equivocates, or neuters its language in the face of an ongoing legal dispute or uncertain outcome. Some news outlets do this reflexively as a general philosophy; it’s why infamous phrases like ‘officer-involved shooting’ and ‘racially tinged’ are so common in the media. At The Verge, we try to call things as they are — up to a certain point. There are journalistic ethics and legal limitations that will leave us sounding ludicrously cautious in many situations. This situation, however, should not have been one of them, but the extraordinary weirdness of what happened caught us flat-footed.”
Read more here.