Wall Street Journal reporters are skeptical about the people being considered for the editorial oversight board that would protect the paper from interference from News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch if he is successful in acquiring the parent company, Dow Jones & Co.
Michael Calderone and Felix Gillette of the New York Observer write, “‘I have no indication that any of them would know what goes into Page 1,’ said one Journal staffer, who added the board should have included ‘people who really understand news coverage.’
“‘To put Ted Olson on the board,’ said another Journal staffer, ‘everyone in the newsroom was like, ‘What the fuck!'”
Calderone and Gillette later quoted another Journal staff as saying: “What these names show is how from the instant this board takes effect, it will be a meaningless, impotent institution. Even before it gets started, you can corrupt it by putting the wrong people on it.'”
Read more here.
Wirecutter editorial director Lauren Sullivan sent out the following: I’m elated to announce that Maxine Builder, a…
"Morning Brew" and Yahoo Finance are partnering to include Yahoo’s market data in the “Markets”…
Modern Healthcare has hired Bridget Early to cover health care regulators. She is currently a health care reporter…
Bloomberg Industry Group seeks a junior reporter to cover environmental litigation. Performs general assignment and…
The Star Tribune is seeking an accomplished, motivated and versatile journalist and leader to shape…
The Deputy AME-Business is responsible for the development and planning of coverage on all Newsday…