Wall Street Journal reporters are skeptical about the people being considered for the editorial oversight board that would protect the paper from interference from News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch if he is successful in acquiring the parent company, Dow Jones & Co.
Michael Calderone and Felix Gillette of the New York Observer write, “‘I have no indication that any of them would know what goes into Page 1,’ said one Journal staffer, who added the board should have included ‘people who really understand news coverage.’
“‘To put Ted Olson on the board,’ said another Journal staffer, ‘everyone in the newsroom was like, ‘What the fuck!'”
Calderone and Gillette later quoted another Journal staff as saying: “What these names show is how from the instant this board takes effect, it will be a meaningless, impotent institution. Even before it gets started, you can corrupt it by putting the wrong people on it.'”
Read more here.
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…
Larry Avila has been named interim editor for Automotive Dive, an Industry Dive publication. He…