Categories: OLD Media Moves

WSJ pulls story after it discovered intern fabricated sources; intern fired

TALKING BIZ NEWS EXCLUSIVE

The Wall Street Journal has posted the following note on its website:

“Bridging a Local Divide,” published online on June 17, has been removed from the Journal’s web sites. Many of the names contained in the article about the re-opening of the 103rd Street Pedestrian Bridge in Manhattan were fabricated by reporting intern Liane Membis, and the quotes couldn’t be independently verified. Ms. Membis is no longer working at The Wall Street Journal.

A Journal spokeswoman provided the following statement:

“Liane Membis was an intern for the Journal for less than three weeks and wrote or contributed to five published pieces ­ one of which has been removed from our online archives and two of which have been edited to remove quotes that were provided by the intern and that cannot be confirmed. Notes detailing the actions taken have been placed at the original URLs. Ms. Membis is no longer working at The Wall Street Journal.”

Here is the pulled story, which was provided to Talking Biz News by a Journal staffer:

For decades, the gulf between Randall’s Island and East Harlem seemed larger than just the East River.

An aging footbridge connecting them was dark, dank and closed part of the year, so the island was often reachable only by car. When the bridge was open, a police officer raised and lowered it every day at sunset. And while East Harlem children were starved for recreation space, new ball fields for private schools were built on Randall’s Island in 2010.

But on June 1, the 103rd Street Pedestrian Bridge opened after undergoing a two-year renovation, connecting the neighborhoods 24 hours a day for the first time in 30 years. And while the bridge isn’t as majestic as the George Washington Bridge or a tourist magnet like the Brooklyn Bridge, it has been embraced in East Harlem as a welcome symbol of unity.

“Sometimes I just come up on this bridge and stop and look around, right up here on the top,” said Katrina Maple, 64 years old. “It’s calming and relaxing. It feels like we finally got our backyard back.”

For longtime residents of East Harlem such as Ms. Maple, the 61-year-old pedestrian footbridge has had a dark past. In the early years when it was accessible at night, the 1,247-foot bridge was rundown and menacing, attracting homeless men pushing creaky carts, drug addicts looking for a fix and the occasional escapee from the island’s psychiatric hospital, neighborhood residents remember.

And there was high-profile crime. On Halloween in 1990, more than a dozen masked youths crossed the footbridge from East Harlem and attacked homeless people on the island with meat cleavers and bats.

By 1994, the city decided to close the bridge in mid-December as an experiment in crime prevention. Eventually, the bridge was closed entirely during the winter months.

East Harlem neighbors saw the closures as a clear sign that they were being shut out of the bucolic community of parks and open space and private bashes thrown by companies such as Bloomberg LP. “It was as if they didn’t want us there,” Ms. Maple said.

And for some, isolating East Harlem from Randall’s Island gleaming new ball fields and hiking paths—even only part-time—seemed more sinister.

“A lot of people in the neighborhood have been concerned about them shutting it down. It seemed like the city didn’t want black folks in the park, you know?” said Saniqua Dimson, 17 years old, of East Harlem.

The private fields and parties—defended by park officials as necessary revenue-generators—still gall many in the neighborhood who see them as symbols of long-standing inequity. But unfettered access to the bridge has eased a bit of the tension.

On a recent evening, dusk surrounded the footbridge with an inviting, not a foreboding, silence. The Department of Transportation spent $16.8 million to restore the bridge with fresh coats of seafoam-green paint, a new electrical control system, and the installation of span-wide pedestrian fencing and handrails on both sides.

“It’s so calming to be here at night,” said 26-year-old Shaila Tompkins pushing a baby stroller. “I don’t feel scared to cross the bridge when its getting dark at all. It feels safe.”

That is by design. According to the city Parks Department, emergency call boxes and lighting have also been installed near the island.

More than 1,000 people crossed the bridge during its first fully open weekend, taking in a cool breeze from the river or breaking a sweat while jogging or cycling. It also attracts visitors from outside the neighborhood, such as schoolteacher Carolyn Turner, 31, of Morningside Heights, who carried two pink five-pound hand weights as she crossed the span.

“I crossed the bridge twice when I first got here because it’s like a low hill and the span is good for working out my legs,” said Ms. Turner, whose students in Harlem told her about the opening.

East Harlem residents describe the bridge and jaunts to Randall’s Island’s waterfront paths and gardens as a welcome time to stretch their legs and get fresh air.

“It’s been a long time coming for the bridge to be open, but I really like that I can come here by foot. We’re always stuck in subways, taxis, and cars,” said Jonqueil Stevens, 40, who has taken his son to Randall’s Island five times. “It feels good to be able to get to a natural space by walking. And it’s not like it’s a nasty dirty path, either. The bridge is so clean and just a straight shot.”

A version of this article appeared June 18, 2012, on page A15 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Bridging a Local Divide

Membis is a former Yale Daily News writer. Said one person in the newsroom: “Her stuff is still on her desk like she could come back at any second. They must have done it over the phone because her name plate and everything is still there.”

Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

View Comments

  • Chris--
    Is this story available in a format that I can print for distribution to my Newsgathering class?

    John
    John Schmeltzer
    University of Oklahoma

  • As an ethical issue, I see three parties involved here: (1) the intern herself; (2) the intern's supervisor at WSJ; and (3)...the intern's professors.

    As a public relations professional now teaching the next generation(s) of public relations (and journalism) professionals at Curry College, I hammer into my students' heads the vital importance of and necessity for ethical standards in their work.

    I emphasize time and again that their publics...those who see/hear/read the information that they communicate on behalf of either clients or employers...RELY on the honesty and accuracy of their communications to help make decisions.

    As a long-time member of the Public Relations Society of America and...now...a Member of the PRSA Board of Directors, I have to point out that PRSA...as well as other professional organizations including the Society of Professional Journalists...has a Code of Ethics that very clearly states and provides examples of possible infractions of the ethical standards that we, as public relations professionals are STRONGLY encouraged to follow.

    Among the "Professional Values" of our Code of Ethics is this: "Honesty: We adhere to the highest standards of accuracy and truth in advancing the interests of those we represent and in communicating with the public."

    In the Code's "Provisions of Conduct," under the heading "Free Flow of Information," are these "Guidelines": "Be honest and accurate in all communications" and "Act promptly to correct erroneous communications for which the practitioner is responsible."

    Back to the intern...She SHOULD have known that fabricating information for her story was unethical...it was LYING. Shame on her.

    To her WSJ supervisor...This individual SHOULD have made it perfectly clear from the start that the Wall Street Journal is a highly-regarded communication medium on which readers rely for news and information. And this individual SHOULD have pointed out the Society of Professional Journallists' Code of Ethics' guidelines on accuracy of information.

    Finally, the college professors...If these individuals didn't stress...from DAY ONE...the ethical standards that ALL communicators are EXPECTED to follow, shame on them.

    The college years are the formative years...start NOW emphasizing the professional standards that serve as guidance in their work.

    It's a shame that this incident occurred. Hopefully all three "concerned parties" will take note and learn...and take serious steps to encsure that it doesn't happen again.

    Kirk Hazlett, APR, Fellow PRSA
    Member, Board of Directors, Public Relations Society of America, New York, NY
    Associate Professor, Communication/Public Relations, Curry College, Milton, MA

    • Yale doesn't bother with all that. Yale operates on sheer power. It's reputation and its credential is all it really needs to get by, usually. In this case the WSJ nabbed a Yalie just doing what Yalies basically do.

      haha, not to generalize. But it is true mostly, as a matter of Yale culture. It isn't Yale that accounts for the Yalies of the highest integrity, of which there are so many, it is their families and upbringing that causes them to eschew this easy Yalie way out.

      Yalies, per se, don't really don't know any better. It is an overrated institution where just going there opens doors.

      Here on the Northeast Corridor, credentials are huge currency. Out west, your credential is nice, but lets judge your merits. Let's talk to you and find out who you are, what you know, how good you are at what you do.

      That process is dispensed with here, and I mean totally dispensed with.

  • In all of the commentary on this story, on this and other sites, I have yet to read a single quote from Membis or anyone not taking the WSJ point of view on this. That's not very even-handed or fair journalism.

  • This is so sad! How many really talented -- and ethical -- journalism students would love to have that opportunity at WSJ. In a past job, I hired a few. Our profession has enough difficulties staying viable without incidents such as these.

  • In response to Bacon: Perhaps all who read of WSJ's action recognize Membis' lack of comprehending basic vocabulary, definitions and principles taught in most introductory college journalism courses, and therefore realized there is really no debate or other side. She didn't practice ethical behavior as set forth in the Code of Ethics (The Society of Professional Journalists), doesn't understand the definition of accuracy, and didn't apply fairness.

    Or in her defense(?) never purchased a journalsim text and skipped the lecture on journalism and ethics?

Recent Posts

SpaceNews hires Gruss as chief content and strategy officer

Mike Gruss, the former editor in chief of Defense News, has been hired as chief…

1 hour ago

Marfil among the WSJ layoffs in DC

Jude Marfil, newsroom operations manager for The Wall Street Journal in its Washington office, was…

17 hours ago

Greene departing Cointelegraph

Tristan Greene, deputy U.S. news editor at cryptocurrency news site CoinTelegraph, is leaving next month…

17 hours ago

Dynamo hires former Business Insider executive editor Harrington

Former Business Insider executive editor Rebecca Harrington has been hired by Dynamo to be its…

3 days ago

Bloomberg TV hires Kerubo as desk producer

Bloomberg Television has hired Brenda Kerubo as a desk producer in London. She will be covering Europe's…

3 days ago

Jittery CNBC staff reassured by new boss

In a meeting at CNBC headquarters Thursday afternoon, incoming boss Mark Lazarus presented a bullish…

3 days ago