CNN’s Soledad O’Brien took an unusual tack in a recent story by noting that drug company’s research and development spending could be affected by Wal-Mart forcing more generic drugs, noted Ken Shepherd of the Business & Media Institute.
Shepherd wrote, “O’Brien’s concern for the drug industry’s ability to fund research for groundbreaking new drugs is a marked departure from standard reporting on the drug industry. In reality, it can cost a drugmaker as much as $800 million just to get a new drug to market, though reporters have overlooked that fact in favor of complaining about pharmaceutical advertising.
“On the February 20 ‘In the Money,’ panelist Jennifer Westhoven repeated the claim from liberal Tufts University’s Dr. Jerome Kassirer that about 90 percent of pharmaceutical marketing ‘goes to wining and dining doctors.’ Westhoven and her panelists ignored the fact that in 2003, the amount spent on direct-to-consumer advertising by members of PhRMA, a pharmaceutical industry group, amounted to only one-tenth of that spent on research and development.
Kassirer even took issue with free drug samples that drug company representatives often leave for physicians to give to patients on a trial basis. ‘Any time you use those free samples, then the doctor gets used to using that particular drug and that raises the cost of care,’ Kassirer complained.
“None of the CNN crew paused to question Kassirer’s logic or whether his opposition to free samples might hurt patients unable to afford prescription medicine.”
OLD Media Moves
Worried about drug company R&D spending
September 22, 2006
CNN’s Soledad O’Brien took an unusual tack in a recent story by noting that drug company’s research and development spending could be affected by Wal-Mart forcing more generic drugs, noted Ken Shepherd of the Business & Media Institute.
Shepherd wrote, “O’Brien’s concern for the drug industry’s ability to fund research for groundbreaking new drugs is a marked departure from standard reporting on the drug industry. In reality, it can cost a drugmaker as much as $800 million just to get a new drug to market, though reporters have overlooked that fact in favor of complaining about pharmaceutical advertising.
“On the February 20 ‘In the Money,’ panelist Jennifer Westhoven repeated the claim from liberal Tufts University’s Dr. Jerome Kassirer that about 90 percent of pharmaceutical marketing ‘goes to wining and dining doctors.’ Westhoven and her panelists ignored the fact that in 2003, the amount spent on direct-to-consumer advertising by members of PhRMA, a pharmaceutical industry group, amounted to only one-tenth of that spent on research and development.
Kassirer even took issue with free drug samples that drug company representatives often leave for physicians to give to patients on a trial basis. ‘Any time you use those free samples, then the doctor gets used to using that particular drug and that raises the cost of care,’ Kassirer complained.
“None of the CNN crew paused to question Kassirer’s logic or whether his opposition to free samples might hurt patients unable to afford prescription medicine.”
Read more here.
Media News
Kudlow to remain at Fox Business
November 16, 2024
Media News
Wired senior writer Meaker is departing
November 15, 2024
Media News
CNBC’s head of events departing after 28 years
November 15, 2024
Media News
WSJ taps Beaudette to oversee business, finance and economy
November 15, 2024
Media News
NY Times taps Searcey to cover wealth and power
November 15, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.