Bill Witherup writes on the Political Affairs magazine web site that he would like to see more labor coverage in daily newspapers, especially the two daily newspapers in his hometown, Seattle.
“When I asked one of the business editors of the two dailies, via email, why there was so little coverage of labor in the paper, and why the Business section was called the Business section, he replied that it was business that most readers were interested in. He did not say the obvious, that the corporate world provides most of the advertising revenue. (Check out the cost, for instance, for a full page mobile phone ad!)
“One of the assumptions of the print media – and television is not worth talking about in terms of a free press – is that the working classes do not read and can not think. Therefore the likes of Bill Gates get a bully pulpit – and he is but one example – to push technology and see to it that as many young people go to university so that he can keep his cubicles on the Microsoft campus full of white collar drones. Little does the newspaper- reading-public know that in the present greater-Seattle economy – though this is not necessarily so across the entire United States – that a trade-union worker makes a better living, and has better health-care than most university graduates. Granted, this situation may not last forever, given global warming and the repercussions for all of us.”
Read more here.
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
View Comments
Bill Witherup poses a question that's valid far beyond the Seattle area and I'm sad to see no one has offerred an explanation for the lack of labor -- union and non-union. Could it be that labor doesn't flood the media with news releases?
Agreed Jim. This phenomenon is not just confined within Seattle area. In fact, this lack of coverage of labor related issues is very common with modern era newspapers- the world over.
My personal assumption about the issue has always been in line with Mr. Witherup when -he says
"He did not say the obvious, that the corporate world provides most of the advertising revenue. (Check out the cost, for instance, for a full page mobile phone ad!)".
That might be the most suitable explanation for this phenom.