Greg Gentschev, the founder of Brekiri, a business information-focused search engine, writes about what he perceives to be the problems with business journalism.
Gentschev hates earnings stories, and he can’t understand the dearth of good business blogs.
“Business magazines and especially trade publications do a better job, of course. Trade publications in particular provide more in-depth analyses of their industries and specific companies. Unfortunately, I’m pretty much a generalist, so I can’t necessarily spend the time to keep track of these resources. I also tend to avoid subscribing to specific sources unless I need them for a current client project.
“In the end, we get the information, like the government, that we deserve. There’s simply no mass market for better business information, so in a way I can’t really hold the business press responsible for a certain striving for the lowest common denominator. Consider the fact that the Wall Street Journal, since being purchased by News Corp and slowly evolving towards a business tabloid, is perhaps the only major US newspaper with increasing circulation. In a way, this is a ‘it’s not you, it’s me’ type of problem. I’m simply out of synch with the type of content and writing that drives mass media markets, such as they are. Depth and utility don’t sell (much).”
Read more here.
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
Members of the CoinDesk editorial team have sent a letter to the CEO of its…
The Capitol Forum is seeking a detail-oriented and collaborative Deputy Managing Editor to support the…
View Comments
Excuse me, waiter-- could I have a table a bit closer to the point? Because any reporter on the job more than about three weeks already knows every complaint he raises, and those complaints were true back when Johann Gutenberg's boss told him to crank out Bibles more quickly back in 1455.
Thanks for the comment, Joey. So your saying this is old news? Isn't that exactly the problem? Journalists have been trained to consider new information "news," even if it doesn't really add anything to the conversation. Even a lot of good bloggers who are supposedly reinventing the medium are getting sucked into that mindset, publishing lists of daily links with a thin layer of summary rather than something more thoughtful. So why is it that the news hasn't been able to resolve these complaints since the days of Gutenberg? I'd be interested in hearing what else every reporter knows about why this is still an issue.
I realize not every article is going to be a deep piece, but most business news organizations aren't showing much effort to innovate, from my perspective as a reader. As you're probably aware, most news is a commodity these days, so I'd like to see people try harder to come up with something unique. With the entire world at your doorstep online, it should be possible to resegment the audience and find people who are interested in a different approach.
Hey, I'd love to see people try harder to come up with something unique. Tell it to my publisher and his boss the CFO. They do not want unique-- they want reliability in the quarterly numbers, so they can make payroll, earn a profit, and live life. Sooner or later, that will drive uniformity of product; even if the product isn't stellar, even if the numbers are trending down, you want as much certainty about that as possible so you can begin planning a response.
The problem isn't confined to news; it's endemic in every business in every industry. We all start out with dreams of conquering the world and eventually realize that making ends meet comes first. You want a formula to do that, and blandness ensues.
I don't have a solution to that, and never said I did. I only said that to notice the problem and diagnose it as such is about as profound as realizing an eraser should go at the far end of the pencil.
I think there's a clear choice between blandness and conquering the world, and not everyone chooses blandness. If pencils didn't have erasers, I'd be advocating that too.