Conde Nast Portfolio contributing editor Gary Weiss finds it hard to believe that former Wall Street Journal managing editor Paul Steiger or anyone at the paper was unaware that a whistle blower was trying to tip them off to the fraud occurring by money manager Bernie Madoff.
Weiss writes, “Excuse me? Is he saying that Markopolos did not approach the Journal, that his testimony is false?
“Anyway, as recounted by Linkins, who based his account on the voluminous supporting documentation released by Markopolos, the whistleblower struggled throughout 2006 to get the Journal’s attention, and actually kept the faith through 2007. I repeat: 2007! The man’s patience was extraordinary.”
Later, Weiss adds, “Since the Journal is unlikely to ever explain itself, I’ll try to offer my guess as to what why a top investigative reporter and his editors dropped the ball so terribly:
“They didn’t believe Markopolos.
“It’s that simple. I can’t think of any other possible explanation, and I don’t think that any other one has any chance of being credible.”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…