Wastler: Other journalists have asked CNBC to take down video
July 28, 2008
Allen Wastler, the managing editor of CNBC.com, notes Monday that he often gets requests to take video of appearances on the business news network off its Web site, including some from other journalists who appear on the air.
Wastler writes, “That’s a serious issue. Publishing something onto a news Web site, in my view, is the same as publishing a newspaper article or broadcasting a television news program. You don’t go back and ‘revise’ it or make it disappear. That’s a creepy, almost Big Brother kind of thing.
“Yet we get requests to do just that (often by fellow journalists, which I find a little disturbing). The reasons range from the serious to the trivial. Somebody made a factual misstatement … that’s serious. But there are some who want videos down because they don’t feel they came off too well or they said something they shouldn’t have. Once someone wanted a piece down because they had a ‘bad hair’ day (not at CNBC … in my previous life).
“Of course if somebody on air said something factually wrong about a situation or another entity, the video should come down. It doesn’t do readers any good to have bad information on the site.
“But pulling video for the rest of the reasons? In some cases it could be viewed as a retraction of sorts. In others, just revisionist. Either way I resist it. Strongly.”
OLD Media Moves
Wastler: Other journalists have asked CNBC to take down video
July 28, 2008
Allen Wastler, the managing editor of CNBC.com, notes Monday that he often gets requests to take video of appearances on the business news network off its Web site, including some from other journalists who appear on the air.
Wastler writes, “That’s a serious issue. Publishing something onto a news Web site, in my view, is the same as publishing a newspaper article or broadcasting a television news program. You don’t go back and ‘revise’ it or make it disappear. That’s a creepy, almost Big Brother kind of thing.
“Yet we get requests to do just that (often by fellow journalists, which I find a little disturbing). The reasons range from the serious to the trivial. Somebody made a factual misstatement … that’s serious. But there are some who want videos down because they don’t feel they came off too well or they said something they shouldn’t have. Once someone wanted a piece down because they had a ‘bad hair’ day (not at CNBC … in my previous life).
“Of course if somebody on air said something factually wrong about a situation or another entity, the video should come down. It doesn’t do readers any good to have bad information on the site.
“But pulling video for the rest of the reasons? In some cases it could be viewed as a retraction of sorts. In others, just revisionist. Either way I resist it. Strongly.”
Read more here.
Full-Time
CT Mirror seeks an environment and energy reporter
November 8, 2024
Media News
Harnessing the power of AI at Dow Jones
November 8, 2024
Media News
Houston energy reporter Drane moves to investigations team
November 8, 2024
Full-Time
Houston Chronicle seeks an energy transformation reporter
November 8, 2024
Highlighted News
Business Insider founder Blodget is leaving company
November 8, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.