The Washington Post published three corrections Thursday from business section content.
Fair enough. But it’s the other two that have me scratching my head.
The second one reads: “The ‘Why It Costs . . .’ feature in the Jan. 30 Business section, about curbside buses from Washington to New York, incorrectly said that a fare of about $20 is more than the cost of tolls and gasoline required to drive there. The tolls and gas would cost more than $20.”
The third one reads: “The ‘Why It Costs . . .’ feature in the Jan. 30 Business section, about curbside buses from Washington to New York, incorrectly said that a fare of about $20 is more than the cost of tolls and gasoline required to drive there. The tolls and gas would cost less than $20.”
The bolding has been added. Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…