Bob O’Brien of Barron’s takes a shot at the Washington Post for how it tried to put a positive spin on the elimination of its business section.
“Granted, as the Post itself noted, the move is aimed at creating a ‘leaner’ — i.e., less costly — publication. Given the economics of the newspaper industry, in the face of steep declines in auto, housing and retail advertising revenues, downsizing is preferable to elimination, as has happened in cities such as Tucson, as threatens to happen in Detroit and Seattle, where publications are gravitating to a web-only distribution system. Three weeks ago, the newspaper publishing operations in Philadelphia filed for bankruptcy. Certainly, the additional loss of income from the financial services advertisers would make the perpetuation of the business coverage that much more endangered.
“Still, in the midst of the blitz-storm in the economy and financial services system, depriving readers of business coverage isn’t adding to the collective wisdom of the investor, who relies upon the financial media for guidance. And spinning the elimination of a section of the paper as an ‘expansion’ of the front section is just flat-out disingenuous.”
Read more here.
Independent Association of Publishers’ Employees board authorized a strike vote to be conducted by its…
The Southern California News Group is seeking an assistant editor to help its jobs and…
Ian Krietzberg, a tech reporter for TheStreet.com, is leaving for a new opportunity. He has…
Timothy B. Lee writes in Asterisk magazine about why a lot of technology reporting is…
Megan Douglass has been named deputy social strategy editor at The Wall Street Journal. Douglass previously…
Business Insider's Louise Ridley is joining The Female Lead, the women's empowerment charity founded by Tesco Clubcard entrepreneur Edwina…