New York Times ombudsman Clark Hoyt writes for Sunday’s paper about what social network and the paper’s videocast of its editor’s meetings means to its perception and uses the example of a business reporter posting Tweets about her frustration at a Toyota Motors press conference as an example.
“With less than three hours of sleep, Tabuchi wrote, she had to get up at 6 a.m. ‘We love you Mr. Toyoda!’ After the news conference, she wrote that Toyoda took few questions and ‘ignored reporters, incl me who tried to ask a follow-up. I’m sorry, but Toyota sucks.’
“Lawrence Ingrassia, the business editor, said reporters have always complained to one another, about irritations at work, sometimes vividly, but when they do it ‘to the world, live, I think it’s unacceptable.’ I would have pulled Tabuchi from the Toyota story, but Ingrassia said he decided not to because what she wrote indicated she was upset with the company’s press arrangements, not prejudiced against it or its products. He said he saw no bias in her reporting and had received no complaints about it.
“Tabuchi said: ‘The banter on Twitter is often very casual and forces us to economize on words. That can be perilous. But the last thing I’d want is collegial banter and humor to affect perceptions of our coverage.'”
Read more here.
Business Insider editor in chief Nicholas Carlson sent the following to the staff on Tuesday: Team! Something…
etf.com is looking for a Managing Editor to join our growing editorial team. The goal…
Business Insider’s global editor-in-chief Nicholas Carlson is stepping down as the company begins a search…
Reuters has hired Barbara Erling to cover Polish political and general news. She has been at the…
The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald seek an experienced journalist and storyteller to launch…
Inside INdiana Business is an award-winning multimedia news platform that distributes business news through an Emmy…