“The larger problem with this incident is that regular citizens, by and large, don’t have a way of speeding up their requests. They aren’t having private meetings with high-level city staffers.”
Read more here.
The editorial states, “At least twice, an MBJ open records request with the City has taken in excess of a year for the records to be returned. While waiting for one of those requests, MBJ editor Greg Akers met with a high-level city staffer (who we do not name because the meeting was on background) and complained that the request was a year old.
“The records were sent to MBJ three days after that meeting.
“In a July interview for the story, the city’s attorney said it was hard to know if that timing was a coincidence. If it wasn’t, it suggests it wasn’t that the city couldn’t get the request fulfilled; it was that they just hadn’t. If it was a coincidence, it doesn’t negate the year-long wait.
“The larger problem with this incident is that regular citizens, by and large, don’t have a way of speeding up their requests. They aren’t having private meetings with high-level city staffers.”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…