Categories: OLD Media Moves

Taking issue with NY Times economics coverage

George Mason University economics professor Russ Roberts is upset about an article written in the New York Times on Tuesday about worker’s wages and productivity, two basic concepts in economics reporting.

The article in question is the Times front-page article by Steven Greenhouse and David Leonhardt, titled “Real Wages Fail to Match a Rise in Productivity.�

Roberts wrote, “Let me repeat the key sentence [from the article]:

“The median hourly wage for American workers has declined 2 percent since 2003, after factoring in inflation.

“That’s a very strange sentence for many reasons:

“1. Why would you use a measure of compensation that ignores benefits, an increasingly important form of compensation?

“2. Why would you use 2003 as your starting point when the recession ended in November of 2001?

“3. There are no government series that I know of on median earnings. Where did those data come from?

“There’s a chart accompanying the article. It tells the reader that the median hourly pay data are from the Economic Policy Institute. The Economic Policy Institute has a policy agenda. Their main issue is the alleged stagnant or falling standard of living of American workers. They support a higher minimum wage and the strengthening of labor unions.

“… for every year since the recession of 2001, real hourly compensation has actually increased. It’s up since 2003 as well. And this year it’s up quite dramatically…

“As I have mentioned here before–the standard claims you hear about labor’s share declining come from using wages without other forms of compensation. When you include benefits, labor’s share is virtually a constant at 70% of national income and has been steady since the end of World War II …”

Read more here.

David Altig, director of research at the Cleveland Federal Reserve, agrees with Roberts, as does Harvard University professor Greg Mankiw. However, Cal-Berkeley’s Brad DeLong calls the article “thoughtful and reliable.”

View Comments

  • Roberts provides an interesting critique, but I'm not sure how useful it is to include benefits in total employee compensation. If the cost to my employer of providing health insurance goes down, but the coverage provided declines, is my compensation growing or shrinking? The amount that is being spent to keep me insured -- and thus the cash cost of my compensation -- may be higher. But the benefit to me is less.

Recent Posts

WSJ’s Eisen to write book about the mortgage market

Wall Street Journal reporter Ben Eisen has signed a contract with Norton to write a book about…

1 hour ago

Reuters hires Krishnakutty as a news producer

Reuters has hired Pia Krishnakutty as a news producer. She has been at The Print as a…

1 hour ago

Indianapolis Biz Journal seeks a news editor

The Indianapolis Business Journal is looking for our next news editor, a role that focuses…

16 hours ago

Axios hires Berkowitz as ME for media and markets coverage

Axios has chosen Ben Berkowitz to be its next managing editor of business and markets.…

21 hours ago

Business Insider hires Ortega as director of newsroom operations

Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm thrilled…

21 hours ago

Rest of World promotes Chandran to deputy editor

Rest of World editor in chief Anup Kaphle sent out the following on Monday: We are excited…

22 hours ago