Categories: OLD Media Moves

Pro vs. con in WSJ.com debate

Mark Glaser of the PBS MediaShift web site has a list of five reasons why The Wall Street Journal should make its web site free to all users, and five reasons why it should remain a pay site.

Here is one of the reasons to make it free:

Business portal dreams. Murdoch has designs on creating the business news portal, something done already to a certain extent at Yahoo Finance, AOL Finance and MSN Money. But the combination of Dow sites such as WSJ.com, MarketWatch and Barron’s, combined with the upcoming Fox Business News cable channel could create a new multi-platform powerhouse.

And here is one of the reasons to keep it a pay site:

Keep WSJ.com differentiated from MarketWatch. Dow Jones already has a free ad-supported business site in MarketWatch, so why would it want another free site to compete with it? There’s a good chance that MarketWatch is already driving subscriptions for the Journal and WSJ.com, so you lose that promotional synergy by making WSJ.com free.

Glaser’s conclusion? He writes, “I think Murdoch needs to think long and hard about how he goes about changing the Journal and its subscription model. Adding more reporters and international coverage? Great. Downplaying print for online? Excellent. Creating a dominant business news portal? Fine. Opening the pay wall? Tough call. There are good points on both sides of this issue.”

Read more here.

Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

View Comments

  • Everybody keeps asking what they should do with their pay wall but I have read that they do not have a choice. WSJ.com has contracts with companies like Congoo.com, Lexisnexis.com and Factiva.com which specifically prohib them from taking down their paywall.

Recent Posts

PCWorld executive editor Ung dies at 58

PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…

1 day ago

CNBC taps Sullivan as “Power Lunch” co-anchor

CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…

3 days ago

Business Insider hires Brooks as standards editor

Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…

3 days ago

Is this the end of CoinDesk as we know it?

Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…

3 days ago

LinkedIn finance editor Singh departs

Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…

4 days ago

Washington Post announces start of third newsroom

Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…

5 days ago