Mark Glaser of the PBS MediaShift web site has a list of five reasons why The Wall Street Journal should make its web site free to all users, and five reasons why it should remain a pay site.
Here is one of the reasons to make it free:
Business portal dreams. Murdoch has designs on creating the business news portal, something done already to a certain extent at Yahoo Finance, AOL Finance and MSN Money. But the combination of Dow sites such as WSJ.com, MarketWatch and Barron’s, combined with the upcoming Fox Business News cable channel could create a new multi-platform powerhouse.
And here is one of the reasons to keep it a pay site:
Keep WSJ.com differentiated from MarketWatch. Dow Jones already has a free ad-supported business site in MarketWatch, so why would it want another free site to compete with it? There’s a good chance that MarketWatch is already driving subscriptions for the Journal and WSJ.com, so you lose that promotional synergy by making WSJ.com free.
Glaser’s conclusion? He writes, “I think Murdoch needs to think long and hard about how he goes about changing the Journal and its subscription model. Adding more reporters and international coverage? Great. Downplaying print for online? Excellent. Creating a dominant business news portal? Fine. Opening the pay wall? Tough call. There are good points on both sides of this issue.”
OLD Media Moves
Pro vs. con in WSJ.com debate
August 15, 2007
Posted by Chris Roush
Mark Glaser of the PBS MediaShift web site has a list of five reasons why The Wall Street Journal should make its web site free to all users, and five reasons why it should remain a pay site.
Here is one of the reasons to make it free:
Business portal dreams. Murdoch has designs on creating the business news portal, something done already to a certain extent at Yahoo Finance, AOL Finance and MSN Money. But the combination of Dow sites such as WSJ.com, MarketWatch and Barron’s, combined with the upcoming Fox Business News cable channel could create a new multi-platform powerhouse.
And here is one of the reasons to keep it a pay site:
Keep WSJ.com differentiated from MarketWatch. Dow Jones already has a free ad-supported business site in MarketWatch, so why would it want another free site to compete with it? There’s a good chance that MarketWatch is already driving subscriptions for the Journal and WSJ.com, so you lose that promotional synergy by making WSJ.com free.
Glaser’s conclusion? He writes, “I think Murdoch needs to think long and hard about how he goes about changing the Journal and its subscription model. Adding more reporters and international coverage? Great. Downplaying print for online? Excellent. Creating a dominant business news portal? Fine. Opening the pay wall? Tough call. There are good points on both sides of this issue.”
Read more here.
Full-Time
Star Tribune seeks a business editor
May 3, 2024
Full-Time
Newsday seeks a deputy AME for biz coverage
May 3, 2024
Media News
CNBC.com promotes two news staffers, hires one
May 3, 2024
Full-Time
Newsday seeks a reporter to cover commercial real estate
May 3, 2024
Full-Time
NY Times seeks a business feature and beat reporter
May 3, 2024
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.