Rothberg writes, “So, it will be up to the empaneled South Dakota jury decide whether ABC made a false report by using the term ‘pink slime’ in their report on LFTB, even if ABC was attributing the term to USDA scientists, who allegedly regularly use the term ‘pink slime’ as slang for LFTB.
“ABC’s counsel states, ‘We believe in the principle that people deserve to know what’s in the food they eat and are confident that when all the facts are presented in court, ABC’s reporting will be fully vindicated.’
“The most interesting wrinkle in this case appears to be its timing coinciding with major societal questions about libel laws, fake news media, the public’s consumption of media, and questions pertaining to the First Amendment.”
Read more here.
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…