That’s the opinion of former BusinessWeek investigative reporter Gary Weiss, whose book “Wall Street versus America” is about to come out. He argues in a post on his blog that the anti-naked shorts such as Overstock.com President Patrick Byrne make accusations about the business journalism media to support their theory that naked shorting is bad.
Weiss said: “One thing I find disturbing about this naked shorting business lately is how the anti-naked-shorts have engaged in some really underhanded, cynical tactics to advance their stupid cause. Lately they’ve been — oh my, how unique this is! — bashing the media left and right.
“For example, I’ve seen circulated on the Internet supposed exchanges of correspondence and communications from reporters (note this post and others on the SABEW blog). The transparent aim is to drum up a phony hate-media hysteria. Note the reference to an unrelated payola scandal in this anti-shorting website, replete with this swill:
“‘How many journalists do you think Wall Street pays off every year to write agenda articles? 1% of the total? 2%? 5%? 10%? If there are 500 financial journalists in NY and the surrounding areas, 2% would be 10. Anyone naive enough to think this is an isolated issue is living in a fool’s paradise.’
“This kind of bonehead rhetoric is typical of the Baloney Brigade. And as for the ranting by Overstock’s Patrick Byrne about Sith Lords and such — the only journalistic issue that I see is that some people in the media have actually taken it seriously. I saw one broadcast journalist, a gent I respect, actually give a platform to some of this silliness.
“Journalists have a duty to their readers and viewers to call that kind of rhetoric what it is — baloney. Funny how I keep coming back to that word.”
Also, a critique of his new book in the New York Post this morning says this: “His eyeglass spares no one, and financial reporters come in for special mention for their sins of omission, as they focus on the machinations in the Morgan Stanley executive suite while ordinary investors are robbed blind by scams that continue to this day.”
Read the entire Weiss post here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
View Comments
I must comment on the critique you mention. In the NY Post, by one of their Variety type writers, mentioning an opinion put out by another Post writer, a Roddy Boyd, who has been alternating between being a journalist and a misguided shill for the hedge fund industry. There is an inherent problem with the Internet. Anyone can publish, and to all intents and purposes write whatever they choose, whether true, or false, or idiotic. It takes a certain amount of followup to determine which. Weiss seems to take a number of different tacks in his piece. It's my impression that the "'machinations in the Morgan Stanley executive suite while ordinary investors are robbed blind by scams that continue to this day'� ARE directly related to the Naked Short Selling Scandal. If you are interested in reading about what Mr. Weiss is rebutting, please visit http://WWW.CFRN.NET, where they have put up a large amount of audio and slideshow information on the subject, under the heading FRAUD ON WALL STREET. You can also find a great deal of information at http://www.thesanitycheck.com