Aline Van Duyn and Joshua Chaffin of The Financial Times write that News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch defending himself against accusations that he influences editorial content in his newspapers regarding China.
The comments were done to try to calm concerns that he would influence the editorial content of The Wall Street Journal if allowed to purchase its parent, Dow Jones & Co.
“‘I had told the HarperCollins editors not to publish the Patten book because I did not think it would sell, but then they went ahead anyway,’ Mr Murdoch said. ‘When I then found out they were publishing it, I told them anyone else could publish it, just not them. In retrospect, it would have been better just to publish it.’
“Mr Murdoch said the decision by his Star TV satellite group to drop the BBC’s English-language news channel was driven by commercial considerations: ‘Star was losing $100m per year; we had to pay $10m per year to the BBC. I said ‘Let them pay it themselves’, and they did. We also cancelled two other third-party channels – MTV and Prime Sports. At that stage we never ever had any request from anybody in China. Indeed, there was no discourse at all.'”
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…