Jeff Bercovici of Conde Nast Portfolio writes Tuesday that new Wall Street Journal owner Rupert Murdoch appears to be already cutting into his agreement not to interfere in the paper’s operations by changing the job of publisher of the paper to one that is only involved in the editorial side of the operations.
“‘I don’t think it’s consistent with the spirit of the agreement,’ says Jane Kirtley, a professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota. ‘I can’t point to a provision where they’re in violation of the terms, as spelled out in black and white. But whether they’re in violation of the spirit is a fair question.’
“‘Let me put it this way,’ Kirtley adds. ‘I think the agreement was drafted in such a way that it left open a lot of room for maneuvering.’
“Indeed, because of that room, it’s easy to make the case that there’s nothing untoward about News Corp.’s actions. Tom Bray, chairman of the five-person committee charged with overseeing compliance of the agreement, notes that it explicitly delineates the authority of the managing editor and editorial page editor but does not do so for the publisher. A change in the publisher’s duties, therefore, lies outside the agreement’s purview.”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…