Categories: OLD Media Moves

Marketwatch and Madoff investment by columnist: An ethical issue?

TALKING BIZ NEWS EXCLUSIVE

Marketwatch has had some of the best reporting about disgraced hedge fund manager Bernard Madoff in the past 10 days.

In particular, a column by Robert Powell posted Monday about how his wife lost her 401(k) and her job due to the failure of Madoff’s company was poignant.

But MarketWatch hasn’t disclosed that one of its columnists, chief economist Irwin Kellner, is one of Madoff’s clients who has lost money even though it’s been reported elsewhere. Kellner has filed suit against Madoff and his company.

I asked David Callaway, Marketwatch’s editor in chief, why that’s the case.

Callaway replied via e-mail, “No real discussion or decision about it, to be honest. If we do a story about the list of victims, we’d certainly include him, perhaps somewhere between Spielberg and Zuckerman.”

Callaway later stated, “If Irwin felt compelled to write about it, we’d be happy to take a look. But his brief is really economics, where Powell’s topic is personal finance and individual asset management, which ties in much closer with the scandal.”

I’ll accept Callaway’s rationale, but I’m still uneasy that Marketwatch hasn’t disclosed that one of its “name” columnists has a vested interest in how the Madoff case plays out. In business journalism, it’s always safe to err on the side of caution and disclose as much as possible.

To Callaway’s credit, he notes how aggressive Marketwatch has been in covering the case. He stated, “Powell’s piece was so unique and personal, and early on in the breaking scandal, that it really covered the victims angle for us in a way that competitors didn’t have, so we just linked to WSJ’s story list of victims and moved on to other stuff, such as this excellent piece last night by Alistair Barr on how Madoff’s arrangements with hedge funds worked and how it might have exploded ten years ago.”

You can read Barr’s piece here, and Powell’s column here.

View Comments

  • Not all in this Madoff mess were rich or greedy, just hard working people who saved all their lives. Losing faith in market,funds, brokerage accounts and banks it seemed a conservative approach, at least to the unsophistocated investor. In our 60s and 70s now , we put our entire pension, IRA and savings with our long term friend (who helped get us into the fund as we did not meet the threshold of $2m) we eventually lost all $4m and that was grew not because of BIG gains rather by our continued contributions and few withdrawals. Our total investment was $2.8. The only withdrawals were for mandatory retirement at 70 1/2, and we took the minimal. We have a severely handicapped daughter who requires daily care for rest of her life and that money was to give us peace of mind that she would be cared for when we could no longer do it. We were not greedy, we were stupid, we believed we could trust people. We are both educated professionals who spent our time on OUR jobs and left the money management to who we thought were Professionals.

Recent Posts

Dynamo hires former Business Insider executive editor Harrington

Former Business Insider executive editor Rebecca Harrington has been hired by Dynamo to be its…

1 day ago

Bloomberg TV hires Kerubo as desk producer

Bloomberg Television has hired Brenda Kerubo as a desk producer in London. She will be covering Europe's…

1 day ago

Jittery CNBC staff reassured by new boss

In a meeting at CNBC headquarters Thursday afternoon, incoming boss Mark Lazarus presented a bullish…

1 day ago

Making business news accessible to a wider audience

Ritika Gupta, the BBC's North American business correspondent, was interviewed by Global Woman magazine about…

1 day ago

Rest of World hires Lo as China reporter

Rest of World has hired Kinling Lo as a China reporter. Lo was previously a…

1 day ago

Bloomberg rises to No. 7 biz news website

Bloomberg News saw strong unique visitor growth to its website in October, passing Fox Business…

1 day ago