Categories: OLD Media Moves

Let's lay off WSJ's Wilke

TALKING BIZ NEWS EXCLUSIVE

Conde Nast Portfolio writer Jesse Eisinger wrote the following for Talking Biz News about recent criticism of Wall Street Journal reporter John Wilke, who apparently received a tip several years ago about the Bernie Madoff fraud case.

Eisinger writes:

“I’m pretty jaded, so typically when I see journalists eating their own, I barely pause from my daily routine. But I¹ve been flabbergasted by comment about The Wall Street Journal’s John Wilke, my former colleague, regarding his role in the Bernard Madoff scandal. It’s way out of line and verges on the delusional.

“None of the bloggers and assorted critics seem to have researched what Wilke was doing during the period he supposedly missed the Madoff story. Wilke is one of the finest investigative journalists in the country and he continued to prove it in the time he was in contact with Harry Markopolos, the Madoff critic.

“Converting a speculative tip from someone like Markopolos is vastly harder than it looks in retrospect. Markopolos was an outsider who figured out something was wrong with Madoff — but wasn’t sure exactly what that was. Nobody ‘tees up’ stories about financial frauds ­as one of Wilke’s detractors wrote on Romenesko, misspelling both his and Markopolos’s name. Ever.

“As all journalists, Wilke was likely conducting constant triage at the time, deluged by tips, story ideas, editor pressure and breaking news. Nevertheless, here’s a partial list of what he wrote in that period:

  • On Dec. 27, 2005, Wilke broke that legendary mutual-fund trader Mario Gabelli, then a bigger name on Wall Street than Madoff, had set up what appeared to be sham minority and small-business firms to bid for discounted FCC spectrum licenses. Six months after the story appeared, Gabelli settled civil fraud claims with the government for $100 million.
  • On Feb. 10, 2006, Wilke did a page-one story about alleged price-fixing by China’s vitamin makers.
  • On April 7, Wilke revealed a network of West Virginia non-profits set up by former staffers and supporters of Rep. Alan Mollohan, funded by congressional earmarks. (The New York Times followed the next day.)
  • On Oct. 11, the Journal reported that most of the earmarks won by Rep. Charles Taylor, a North Carolina Republican, also benefited his family banking and timber interests.
  • On Nov 1, Wilke exposed that a wealthy Nevada defense contractor had funneled nearly $100,000 in campaign cash to Gov. Jim Gibbons through a network of his companies, side-stepping state campaign-finance laws and treating his patron to a lavish, undisclosed Caribbean cruise.

“I could go on about Wilke scoops. But the point is clear: For a year after December 2005, Wilke bagged a series of journalistic trophies that would make any self-respecting investigative reporter proud. Yes, with the benefit of hindsight, it is easy to see that he should have demanded that his editor give him the rest of the year to do Madoff, and nothing else. But let’s get serious.”

View Comments

  • It's not accurate to say that Markopolos "figured out something was wrong with Madoff – but wasn’t sure exactly what that was." He determined that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, and said so in his submissions to the SEC.

    The Journal and Mr. Wilke are going to have to live with the fact that they didn't screwed up.

  • Self righteous certainty is a wonderful drink, particularly for those without much self-awareness. The working journalist who can, after 5, 10, or 20 years in the business, insist that the big one never once slipped his hook probably never caught anything much worth talking about in the first place.
    Every day we make decisions about stories to follow, and occasionally we guess wrong. You hope in the end that the stories you are pursuing are as good as those you are putting on the shelf. And, Jon Young's misapprehensions to the contrary, no story is as simple as AHA, he said it was a ponzi scheme and so ...
    Nope. The distance from the cup to the lip is long and complicated. And, again, sometimes you guess wrong.

  • Humbug. Even after the Journal lost this scoop to the world, it didn't produce a story about how its man was courted by the same source who became a hero to the rest of the world. But then Markopolos blew the whistle on the Journal, which was left with egg on its face.

  • Yes Wilke was doing nice work at WSJ. But He lost the Super Bowl, the biggest finacial fraud story. No excuse for that.

Recent Posts

UN ambassador blasts Russia over WSJ’s Gershkovich

The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has lambasted Russia over its continued detention of…

2 hours ago

WSJ shifting Asia ops to Singapore, layoffs occurring

Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Thursday: Today we announced…

9 hours ago

Is it a news organization, or a hedge fund?

Clare Malone of The New York writes about Hunterbrook, which is using reporting from journalists to…

11 hours ago

Awards editor Coates is leaving The Hollywood Reporter

The Hollywood Reporter awards editor Tyler Coates is leaving the news organization. His last day will be…

11 hours ago

Purkess promoted to consumer features editor at The Sun

Laura Purkess has been promoted to consumer features editor at The Sun. She will maintain…

11 hours ago

Ferrier, senior biz reporter at Coloradoan, is retiring

Pat Ferrier, senior business reporter at the Coloradoan in Fort Collins, is retiring after 23…

11 hours ago