TALKING BIZ NEWS EXCLUSIVE
Conde Nast Portfolio writer Jesse Eisinger wrote the following for Talking Biz News about recent criticism of Wall Street Journal reporter John Wilke, who apparently received a tip several years ago about the Bernie Madoff fraud case.
Eisinger writes:
“None of the bloggers and assorted critics seem to have researched what Wilke was doing during the period he supposedly missed the Madoff story. Wilke is one of the finest investigative journalists in the country and he continued to prove it in the time he was in contact with Harry Markopolos, the Madoff critic.
“Converting a speculative tip from someone like Markopolos is vastly harder than it looks in retrospect. Markopolos was an outsider who figured out something was wrong with Madoff — but wasn’t sure exactly what that was. Nobody ‘tees up’ stories about financial frauds Âas one of Wilke’s detractors wrote on Romenesko, misspelling both his and Markopolos’s name. Ever.
“As all journalists, Wilke was likely conducting constant triage at the time, deluged by tips, story ideas, editor pressure and breaking news. Nevertheless, here’s a partial list of what he wrote in that period:
“I could go on about Wilke scoops. But the point is clear: For a year after December 2005, Wilke bagged a series of journalistic trophies that would make any self-respecting investigative reporter proud. Yes, with the benefit of hindsight, it is easy to see that he should have demanded that his editor give him the rest of the year to do Madoff, and nothing else. But let’s get serious.”
The Wall Street Journal is seeking a senior video journalist to join its Features video…
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
View Comments
It's not accurate to say that Markopolos "figured out something was wrong with Madoff – but wasn’t sure exactly what that was." He determined that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, and said so in his submissions to the SEC.
The Journal and Mr. Wilke are going to have to live with the fact that they didn't screwed up.
Self righteous certainty is a wonderful drink, particularly for those without much self-awareness. The working journalist who can, after 5, 10, or 20 years in the business, insist that the big one never once slipped his hook probably never caught anything much worth talking about in the first place.
Every day we make decisions about stories to follow, and occasionally we guess wrong. You hope in the end that the stories you are pursuing are as good as those you are putting on the shelf. And, Jon Young's misapprehensions to the contrary, no story is as simple as AHA, he said it was a ponzi scheme and so ...
Nope. The distance from the cup to the lip is long and complicated. And, again, sometimes you guess wrong.
Humbug. Even after the Journal lost this scoop to the world, it didn't produce a story about how its man was courted by the same source who became a hero to the rest of the world. But then Markopolos blew the whistle on the Journal, which was left with egg on its face.
Yes Wilke was doing nice work at WSJ. But He lost the Super Bowl, the biggest finacial fraud story. No excuse for that.