A federal judge on Monday barred the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from seeking claims on behalf of 32 Bloomberg employees who allege they were discriminated against after getting pregnant.
Rich Holder of the New York Post writes, “‘The court does not impose this severe sanction lightly and recognizes that certain … claims may be meritorious but now will never see the inside of a courtroom,’ Chief Manhattan federal Judge Loretta Preska wrote in a 30-page ruling siding with Bloomberg LP.
“‘However, the Court finds that allowing the EEOC to revisit conciliation at this stage of the case—after shirking its prelitigation investigation responsibilities and spurning Bloomberg’s offer of conciliation … would further prejudice Bloomberg.’
“In 2011, Preska rejected the EEOC’s claim that Bloomberg regularly discriminated against pregnant women but allowed some individual claims to proceed.
“Preska, in a separate 181-page ruling in the six-year-old case, also dismissed claims of pregnancy bias by five other workers against Bloomberg LP, but allowed part of a case by a sixth staffer to move forward.”
Read more here.
Wall Street Journal reporter Hannah Miao is moving to Singapore to cover the China economy.…
Financial Times reporter Simon Foy is now covering European banks. He has been covering accounting for the…
Debtwire, the leading provider of global fixed income news, analysis and data for more than…
Amber Kanwar, an anchor for BNN Bloomberg in Canada, is departing at the end of…
Moody's Ratings has promoted Yvette Kantrow to senior vice president and editor in chief. She has been…
Politico reporter Clare Fieseler is leaving the news organization to take on some ocean reporting projects. She…
View Comments