Jamie Gold, the reader’s representative at the Los Angeles Times, writes Friday about reader complaints to a story in the paper’s business section that compares job losses to those in 1945.
“Girvetz homed in on those last six words, saying he thought readers would have been given a more realistic impression of how this compares historically had The Times focused on job losses as a percentage of total jobs. Because the total number of jobs in the economy more than quadrupled in the last 60-plus years, 2008’s job loss — 1.9% — was the steepest only since a 2.3% drop in 1982. It was only the fifth-worst since WWII. The sixth-worst was 1.3% in 2001.
“Sometimes the most dramatic numbers aren’t necessarily the most helpful in giving readers that picture. Business Editor Sallie Hofmeister acknowledged: ‘I think it is fair to say that more context would have helped the reader and that the story, while not inaccurate, could have included the perspective [the reader] mentions, adding a sentence saying employment is much higher today than in 1945.'”
Read more here.
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
Members of the CoinDesk editorial team have sent a letter to the CEO of its…
The Capitol Forum is seeking a detail-oriented and collaborative Deputy Managing Editor to support the…