Suzanne McGee of The Guardian writes about the dangers of taking financial advice from business journalists.
McGee writes, “Financial reporters have access to smart people who do a great job explaining complicated topics. A lot of other people, less intelligent or more unscrupulous, want to use us to get access to you, our readers. Our job is not to offer personalized financial or investment advice; nor is it to serve as a conduit for pundits.
“Rather, it’s to identify which folks are credible, and whom has more to offer our readers than a soundbite or a stock pick. If it sounds like we’re dishing up what some onlookers have dubbed ‘investment pornography’, it’s time to turn the page, click to the next story, or go watch Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. That’s more enriching than any stock hype.
“It’s tempting to believe that someone out there has inside knowledge and that if we could find that person, and share in that knowledge, then the American dream would be ours. It’s also tempting, in the midst of a world so awash in products, options and strategies, each enthusiastically promoted, that someone out there is wise enough to hand you a shortlist of the half-dozen best ideas.
“I doubt anyone can do such a thing, and if anyone can, it’s probably not going to be a financial journalist.”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…