Categories: OLD Media Moves

Fortune's downfall and its redesign

Marion Maneker of The Big Money writes Thursday that he doesn’t think that a redesign of Fortune magazine is going to help the business glossy.

Maneker writes, “I might even go out and buy the magazine next week just to get it. But if Patricia Sellers doesn’t deliver, I can’t see much else in the magazine that would make me want to subscribe again.

“I say this as someone who read this biweekly magazine nearly cover-to-cover. There was a time in the late 1990s when Fortune was the best magazine in America. It came about as a combination of an extraordinary moment when business was vibrant, refreshing and transformative. Under John Huey, the magazine was packed with talent and took risks of every sort.

“Today is another era. I don’t expect Fortune to be that magazine again. It couldn’t no matter how much money it had to spend. But with the little that I’ve seen of the redesign, I don’t know what it is today.”

Read more here.

View Comments

  • When a business publication starts to flounder, it adds content in three areas:

    (1) 'Entrepreneurship' (that is, small business);
    (2) 'Careers' (that is, people scared about job security);
    (3) 'Personal finance' (that is, people scared they're behind in retirement savings).

    Occasionally they will add content in the 'Gadgets' section too, when they're scrounging for any advertiser they can find and want to shift average age of their readers down a few years.

    This is all a sign of failure, and is why I cancelled my Fortune subscription two years ago. It is more fluff that I can find anywhere-- and not much value to me, really, when I do find it anywhere-- and less news. Strong, successful executives on the CEO track need analysis about industry, government policy, technology, finance. Weak executives worried they might get tossed with the next layoff and end up in line at the job fair worry about starting small businesses, job security, and retirement savings.

    You know when you're out at some professional networking event and some kinda needy person gloms onto you and their name tag says 'consultant'? That person cares about those three things I outlined. And while I hate to be cutthroat about it, you don't want that person to be your reader. You don't want to be the magazine that caters to him. But when you start making changes like Fortune has, that's what you're doing, and that's why the rest of us with money to spend start canceling and spend it elsewhere.

Recent Posts

Dow Jones reports slight increases in revenue, earnings

Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch.com, Barron's and Investor's…

1 hour ago

The Independent hires Baragona as senior reporter

The Independent has hired Justin Baragona as a senior reporter. He will be covering the intersection of…

3 hours ago

Econ Reporting Hardship Program sets up Ledbetter Fund

Author and editor James Ledbetter was a beloved friend, Economic Hardship Reporting Project Board member…

4 hours ago

FT names Brower US news editor, Edgecliffe-Johnson departing

Financial Times editor in chief Roula Khalaf sent out the following on Friday: Hello everyone I'm pleased…

4 hours ago

WSJ’s Brown is leaving publication

Ken Brown of The Wall Street Journal is leaving the news organization. He is an…

1 day ago

Jones will not seek another Dow Jones News Fund board term

Dow Jones News Fund President Brent W. Jones announced at the nonprofit journalism training organization’s…

1 day ago